SBP provided implementation and support for the IBM Lotus® Symphony™ integration into the eXpresso extensions for IBM LotusLive™ on several different operating systems and browsers. ... read more

"SBP helped eXpresso build a strong partnership with IBM, towards integrating eXpresso's real-time collaboration services with IBM's document sharing and editing solutions, hosted on the LotusLive platform."

Gavin Harvett
VP Product Management, eXpresso Corp.



Articles



Recent blog entries

Android 4.0: the Google delight
Dec 21, 2011, by Oana Pelineagra
More than a Cupcake, Donut, Eclair, Gingerbread and Honeycomb, and more than a tasty name, Android Ice Cream Sandwich (v 4.0.) is the OS that wants to merge the smartphone market and the tablet market under one roof....read more
Android 3.0 Honeycomb: ready to conquer the tablet market
Jul 19, 2011, by Oana Pelineagra
The latest arrival to the tablet OS is Android 3.0. Although an emerging market, the tablet ecosystem continues to grow and to offer users more and more choices in terms of operating systems and hardware devices. ...read more
Super OS - is this the future of operating systems?
May 10, 2011, by Oana Pelineagra
Jumbo is a remarkable development and I salute AI for such a product, and although now I stick to my sole OS, chances are that in the near future I'll be switching between multiple OS and environments with a simple click....read more




Windows 2.0


The second version of Microsoft Windows appeared on the 1st of November, 1987, which meant a significant improvement to the original version. This one made Windows based computers look more like a Macintosh. This is why, in 1988, Apple Computer did not approve of such a resemblance and filed another lawsuit against Microsoft, claiming that Microsoft had broken the licensing agreement from 1985.

Basically, Windows 2.0 enabled windows to overlap each other, unlike Windows 1.0, which only displayed tiled windows. Few people know that actually the tiled windows from version 1.0 were a limit artificially imposed because of lawsuits from Apple Computers - in Windows 1.0, the dialogs and drop down menus were in fact also overlapping windows.
Version 2.0 also introduced the window manipulation terminology of "Minimize" and "Maximize" as opposed to "Iconize" and "Zoom" from Windows 1.0, plus a more elaborate mechanism of keyboard shortcuts which meant that shortcut keys were identified by underlining the character that, in conjunction with the "Alt" key, would cause them to be selected. Meanwhile, file management tasks were still managed by use of the MS-DOS Executive program, which was more list driven than icon oriented.

The first Windows versions of Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel ran on Windows 2.0. At this stage, third party developer support for Windows increased substantially, for example some were shipping the Windows Runtime software with their applications, for customers who had not purchased the full version of Windows. However, most developers still maintained DOS versions of their applications, as Windows users were still a distinct minority of the market.

Xerox Alto ComputerAs for the lawsuit filed in 1988, Microsoft claimed in their defense that the licensing agreement actually gave them rights to use Apple features, which was, of course, the truth. Microsoft won after a four years court case. Apple claimed that Microsoft had infringed on 170 of their copyrights. The court said that the licensing agreement gave Microsoft the rights to use all but nine of the copyrights, and Microsoft later convinced the courts that the remaining copyrights should not be covered by copyright law. Bill Gates strike back at Apple claiming that they had taken ideas from the graphical user interface developed by Xerox for Xerox's Alto and Star computers. On June 1, 1993, Judge Vaughn R. Walker of the U.S. District Court of Northern California ruled in Microsoft's favor in the Apple vs. Microsoft & Hewlett-Packard copyright suit. The judge granted Microsoft's and Hewlett-Packard's motions to dismiss the last remaining copyright infringement claims against Microsoft Windows versions 2.03 and 3.0, as well as HP NewWave.

Until the third Windows version would appear on the market, personal computer users could experiment with the Windows 386, which introduced a 32 bit protected mode kernel and virtual machine monitor. This basically meant that the hardware parts of the PC were linked in a safe mode to the software operating system thus enabling applications to run imitating a real machine. For the duration of a Windows session, it created one or more virtual 8086 environments, which allowed the execution of real mode applications that were incapable of running directly in protected mode, and provided device virtualization for the video card, keyboard, mouse, timer and interrupt controller inside each of them.

An Interrupt controller referred to an asynchronous signal from hardware indicating the need for attention or a synchronous event in software indicating the need for a change in execution. The user-visible consequence was that it became possible to preemptively multitask multiple MS-DOS environments in separate windows, although graphical MS-DOS applications required full screen mode.

Next articles in this series:

1. The beginnings
2. First steps in operating systems
3. Windows 1.0
4. Windows 2.0
5. Windows 3.0
6. Windows 95
7. Windows 98
8. Windows Me
9. Windows 2000
9. Windows XP
10. Windows Vista
11. Windows 7





Visit our Blog


Tell a Friend
Link to us
Add to Favorites
Set as Homepage


Contact Us

For more info, please email at or go to the contact page.



         

The benefits of working with a Microsoft Certified Partner